This week is all about worship! Throughout the week I will be posting both my answers to a series of questions as well as those of three other bloggers.
If you missed parts I & II, you can check them out at the link below.
Why Can't We Get Along? - Why is Worship So Divisive by Sean Chandler
Where's the Piper Organ, and Why is There an Electric Guitar?!? - What is the Proper Style for Worship by Sean Chandler
How Should a Worship Director Select & Arrange Their Set Lists?
I
personally prefer to try and not speak dogmatically about things where
scripture gives no specifics. There's no chapter in the Bible that gives
a correct template for a worship service. There are no instructions on song
selection. We simply know we're to worship in "Spirit and in truth."
Ironically, so many worship songs today do a pretty bad job with the
"truth" part.
Everything I’m
about to write is really just my opinion, but I think it's a pretty good
opinion.
I
personally like for songs to be selected based on supporting the central
message of the sermon. Music has a powerful ability to stir emotions, and
our minds. The majority of Christians have far more worship songs
memorized than verses. By crafting worship sets that affirm the central
message of the sermon or the text taught, you create a powerful one-two punch.
Generally
speaking, I also believe set lists should balance between songs which are about
God, and songs which are song to God. A set that is filled with songs
that only speak about God eventually feels like we're talking about someone
without acknowledging they're in the room. On the flip side, a set all about
our response to God comes off anthropocentric (man centered). A
combination of the two creates a scenario where we proclaim the
"truth" of who God is, and respond appropriately.
I'm a fan
of hymns done in modern styles. While I love discovering new worship, I'm
not a fan of worship leaders ignoring songs after their 2nd birthday.
Understandably, some songs age very badly ("Lord I Lift Your Name on
High"), but other songs are thrown out simply because they're not brand
new.
Finally, I
really don't understand why so many worship leaders are obsessed with
over-the-top repetition. That's not true. I have my theory. I
suspect far too many worship leaders take their cues directly from live worship
albums. Hillsong recorded an 8
minute version of "Mighty to Save," therefore, that must be the best
way to do it. Well there's a big difference between being at a conference
with 10,000 people for a live recording, and your average Sunday morning.
People take techniques used for big events and translate them to small
events. It's weird.
What is the
Proper Volume for a Church Service?
This is the
big, divisive question. This is the issue we get the most complaints about.
This is the question that has driven countless churches to monstrosities
known as electronic drums. This is the question where there is no answer to
make everyone happy.
As someone
who has played in multiple punk and ska bands back in the day, I like music
loud. As a sound man, dynamic full band music doesn't work below 85 to 90
decibels. Below 85 decibels, sound frequencies are highly uneven.
Bass in particular doesn't have the proper filling effect. When you run
music too soft, you kill the dynamics.
This leads
to the tension. If you run the
music soft enough that no one will complain, you will also be running music so
bland that it will excite no one...like I said, this is with a full band
playing dynamic songs.
Further
complicating the issue is vocabulary. The average person in the
congregation has a very limited vocabulary when describing the mix on a given
Sunday. Really, there are only three words: loud, soft, and good.
"The band is too loud." "The guitar is too soft."
"It sounds good." While that's the language people use,
the issue is far more complicated. While we talk using simply volume
language, in reality there are four big factors in play: volume,
compression, EQ, and effects. In short, often the issue isn't volume.
Often the issue is a volunteer soundman who doesn't know how to properly
control compression, EQ, and/or effects. Therefore, the music isn't actually
all that loud, but it is painful to listen to.
Consider
the sound of an overly powerful cymbal. It's shrill in your ears, and
causes painful vibrations. But, really, any instrument poorly mixed and
EQ'd can cause this same effect. Or, consider bass guitar or kick with
excessive amounts of low end. They can cause you to literally feel the bass.
I personally love that feeling, but others hate it.
In
conclusion, I think the volume should match the style of music, and the
leadership of the church needs to decide what they believe is the proper
volume. They should be sensitive to those who don't enjoy loud music without
allowing the loudest complainer to steer the ship. Likewise, many
complaints about the volume are actually caused by untrained soundmen (or bad
equipment). Therefore, churches should probably spend more time finding a way
to train their volunteers.
No comments:
Post a Comment