Several months back, while playing catch up on the blogs I follow, I came across an interesting ad. "This Fall we're starting a conversation on missional living!" Curious about the nature of the conversation, I clicked on their link to see what they meant. A slick looking website suddenly appeared in front of my eyes featuring a description of the conversation, as well as a list of famous pastors who'd be participating.

Months later, the day came to converse with the Chan. I found a seat, and waited for him to take the stage. Within minutes he stepped out on stage, and it began!
To be honest, it was a bit of a one-sided conversation. Every time I would respond to something he said, the other 1,000 people participating in the conversation would give me a funny look. Come to think of it, all of us were heavily discouraged from speaking whenever he was talking, and he probably went for a good 45 minutes straight. When he finally finished talking, we were encouraged to take a 10 minute bathroom break before the “conversation” continued. After the break, a new person stepped up on stage and started talking from up front. Once again, I got funny looks when I responded with anything other than laughter at his jokes.
While not perfect conversations, what I really like about these “conversation” events is that they’re far more relational than church conferences. For part of my honeymoon, my wife and I attended the Passion Conference, which Francis Chan happened to be speaking at. It was a great event, but my one big complaint is that I didn’t get an opportunity to talk to any of the speakers. They just stepped out onto a large stage, spoke for 45 minutes straight, and then we’d have 10 minute break before the next speaker came up. Obviously, at a conference, it’s highly frowned upon to interrupt the speaker mid-message.
So while these new “conversations” may not be the best
conversations I’ve been a part of, they’re a huge improvement over conferences.
No comments:
Post a Comment